According to a CareerBuilder Survey, 82 percent of employers seem to think there will be no negative impact on the company when a candidate has a less-than-stellar recruitment experience. The survey goes on to suggest they are wrong.
In Q4 2018, Prism Executive Recruitment polled 3,000 experienced management consultants with a short questionnaire. The results provide valuable insights into why consultants change jobs and how they go about their job search.
As part of the Job Search survey we asked the question: “how could employers improve your job search experience?” With forums such as Glassdoor and the platform of social media, candidate experience is becoming more and more important and a critical factor in attracting top talent.
We examine the four chief gripes and explain how firms can gain an advantage over their competitors by ensuring their recruitment process is efficient and professional.
Feedback and responding
Overwhelmingly and by far the most frequent comments related to lack of feedback or responsiveness during the application process. Respondents referred to lack of “basic manners” and “I’m amazed at how many…firms don’t let the candidate know” and even “if I don’t get a response I reject that employer forever”. One noted, “so often even second interviews receive no feedback: arrogant and unprofessional”.
A LinkedIn survey further highlighted that while 94 per cent of job seekers wanted feedback after the interview, only 41 per cent received it.
There is really no excuse not to reply to candidates. Ideally, an employer will follow up with ALL candidates, even those who are unsuccessful and Prism Executive Recruitment always do this. However with response rates sometimes in the hundreds, many firms simply do not have the resources to do so.
But an employer should certainly create an email auto-response for each job application that they receive. It can be something as simple as stating, “We are most appreciative of your application. We are unfortunately not able to provide individual feedback but will be in touch within two weeks of this email if we are able to take your interest further. Thank you.”
That way, job seekers know that:
- their application was submitted properly and received, and
- if they do not hear back within the time frame stated, they are probably not going to be considered for the position.
For the candidates that are called forward, unless there are significant recruitment volumes, a simple spreadsheet should ensure that applications are managed effectively and candidates are kept informed. Larger employers may need to invest in an applicant tracking system.
If recruiting via a recruitment agency or a specialist executive recruitment consultancy, check that the recruiter guarantees to reply to ALL applicants. It is important to ensure a recruiter with integrity is selected. An agency which cuts corners and fails to keep candidates in the loop reflects badly on the potential employer.
Improve advertisement and job requirements
The survey responses included varied comments with concerns at the lack of salary details, leading to wasted time on both sides; lack of clarity on “essential” and “nice to have” experience and also “candidate requirements” reading like a shopping list of unrealistic or irrelevant criteria a candidate should possess.
Many respondents to the survey commented on the need for more information around the scope and responsibilities of the job role, culture and work-life balance.
Writing advertisements is a fine balance. Too much information and people don’t read further, too little and it raises the concerns expressed above!
Salary is contentious and for obvious reasons, an employer may not feel they want to broadcast details of their pay scales. However once a candidate has applied it should be possible early in the recruitment process to determine whether both sides are in the same territory before any significant time has been expended on either side. Using an agency avoids these constraints of course!
Regarding the job details and candidate specification, a significant problem often arises when the internal job spec is copied/pasted into an advertisement. Not only is this often fairly dry and too detailed but the hiring manager’s long list of ideal candidate attributes are also revealed! Clearly, all recruitment involves compromise but as our survey suggests this can be very off-putting. It may dissuade candidates an employer might be interested in from applying.
Interestingly, research suggests that female candidates are less likely to apply if they don’t meet most or all of the criteria specified so an unintended consequence could be to reduce the diversity of hiring shortlists.
If you are trying to recruit someone for a management consulting job/vacancy, consider what you really need to include in the specification. State the minimum experience you would like them to have in management consultancy, at what level or set out what kind of experience you are looking for. Give examples of clients, projects or tasks, or what is expected of the role. As candidates are likely to be reviewing a large number of consultancy jobs, it is vital to think of ways to stand out with your advertisement.
There was frequent reference to the speed of application processes and the delays in response. Consultants also commented on the desire for clarity around the recruitment process and the stages of the interview. Generally, there was a desire for improved and timely communication as one might expect given the “feedback” observations.
In our experience the majority of employers have a good interview process which candidates are comfortable with: typically three stage and perhaps meeting 3-5 key people. A mixture of interview objectives and styles and sometimes incorporating presentations or case studies.
As suggested the problems arise with delays or when the number of stages extends beyond this. The latter is a particular problem in some larger firms, with horror stories of 12 month recruitment cycles and meeting a similar number of people, or more. Clearly if a candidate was available and engaged at the start of this sort of process it’s unlikely they would be a year later.
The two golden rules are:
- Be clear WHO needs to be involved in a decision making process and WHY. This should reflect as far as possible their strategic relationship to the role and their likely commitment to and availability for, the recruitment process. It may well be a great idea for the MD to meet every joiner: but if that means an employer might lose candidates because of diary availability a different process should be considered.
- Ensure the interviewers’ motivations and goals are congruent with the need to fill the role. Clients always come first? NO. A good hire can be worth much more to a company and a total focus on clients can not only delay the process, sometimes by weeks and months but can also send a powerful message to prospective employees that they, in turn, don’t matter. Hiring managers, CV reviewers and interviewers need to be available and aware that recruitment is a key objective, against which they will be measured and (ideally!) rewarded.
It was clear from many comments that applicants for management consultancy jobs found the increasingly impersonal nature of websites, Applicant Tracking Systems (ATS) and the consultancy recruitment process frustrating. Frequently expressed sentiments were summarised in a one-word comment “humanisation”.
The irony of the internet age is of course that while technology can make it much easier for -people to add the personal touch, in practice many recruiters and hiring managers are overwhelmed by applicants and inadvertently (or deliberately) rely on automated and impersonal systems. Given that one of the key factors in any management consultancy candidate’s interest in a future employer is the people and culture this is clearly at best a wasted opportunity to impress and at worst actively putting off potential hires.
There is no easy solution but underpinning getting this right in a candidate’s eyes is often a mindset change by management consultancy firms and, in particular, approaching the recruitment process through a candidate’s eyes! An employer should actively use “mystery shopper” techniques. If that isn’t appropriate, senior hiring managers should road test it every now and then. Clearly that only works in the early stages!
A good way to make the recruitment experience more personal is to consider a “buddy” system, especially at final stages of an interview process and beyond.
Not all interactions can be personalised but it doesn’t take much/many to transform a candidate’s perceptions. Actively seek opportunities to “be nice”! Make a call or send a personal email on occasion.
To assess the quality of your candidate experience use feedback and surveys (and no not the dreaded automated pop up or auto generated email!) of both the staff who join you and those who don’t. As far as Prism are aware this is unheard of: but like many things obvious when pointed out. Especially as they might decide to share feedback on Glassdoor, or Google or LinkedIn, or their colleagues instead.
The recruitment process you undertake can affect the management consulting jobs you fill now and also in the future, so it is important to get this right.
- Always feedback or respond. While you may receive a large number of applicants, candidates aren’t necessarily applying for a significant number of jobs. This means the impression you give by your response ,or lack of one, could be lasting and may be something that they go on to tell other potential candidates for your consultancy jobs
- Improve your advertisement. Really think about the specification that you are putting out and whom you are appealing to. By explaining what the role could look like and including examples, you will narrow down the list of consultants who are relevant to you, saving a lot of time and administration. Also, consider providing clear information on salary. Salaries can range hugely within management consultancy jobs, so while you might think your specification gives a good indication of what level you are looking for, putting a figure on it will be even better.
- Put a clear process in place. Management consultancy recruitment may be time-intensive, so this needs to pay off with results. A process that is clear to candidates and to your team will help to provide transparency, efficiency and confidence in your organisation.
- Personal touch. This can help you to stand out from other management consultancy jobs and employers your candidates are applying to and also make the process less stressful and more rewarding. If there is a fantastic applicant, then the consultancy recruitment process you develop could be a deciding factor in why they choose you over a competitor.
Addressing some or all of these points is a golden opportunity for enlightened employers to take a lead over their competitors. This is particularly relevant for smaller firms which can demonstrate their more human scale and concern for the individual than would ever be possible for the behemoths!
If you would like to discuss any of the above please contact Chris Sale Managing Director, Prism Executive Recruitment at [email protected]. Find more information about our services on our Client Services page and details of Our Recruitment Solutions.